Skip to content
Define The Cloud

The Intersection of Technology and Reality

Define The Cloud

The Intersection of Technology and Reality

Objectivity

Joe Onisick (@JoeOnisick), April 26, 2010May 26, 2010

I came across a blog recently that peaked my interest.  The post was from Nate at TechOpsGuys (http://bit.ly/9PxZQV) and it purports to explain the networking deficiencies of UCS.  The problem with the posts explanation is that it’s based off of The Tolly Report on HP vs. UCS (http://bit.ly/bRQW2g) which has been shown to be a flawed test funded by HP.  Cisco was of course invited to participate, but this is really just lip service as HP funded the project and designed the test in order to show specific results, typically vendor’s will opt out in this scenario.

There were three typical reactions from the Tolly Report:

  • The HP fan/Cisco bigot reaction:
    • ‘Wow Cisco fails’
  • The unbiased non-UCS expert:
    • ‘There is no way something that biased can be accurate, let me contact my Cisco rep for more info’ (This is not an exaggeration)
  • The Cisco UCS expert:
    • ‘Congratulations, you proved that a 10GE link carries a max of 10GE of traffic, too bad you missed the fact that Cisco supports active/active switching.’ Amongst other apparent flaws.

The TechOpsGuys post mentioned above will have the same types of reactions.  Lover’s of HP will swallow it whole heartedly, major Cisco fans will write it and TechOpsGuys off, and the unbiased will seek more info to make an informed decision.

I initially began writing a response to the post, but stopped short when I realized two things:

  • It would take a lengthy blog to point out all of the technical errors, and incorrect assumptions.
  • It wouldn’t make a difference, Nate has already made up his mind, and anyone believing the blog whole heartedly would have as well.

Nate is admittedly biased towards Cisco and has been for 10 years according to the post.  Nate read the Tolly report and assumed it was spot on because he already believes that Cisco makes bad technology.  Nate didn’t take the time to fact check or do research, he just regurgitated bad information.

This is not a post about Nate, or about HP vs. Cisco, it’s about objectivity.  As IT professionals it’s easy to get caught up in the vendor wars, but unless you’re a vendor it’s never beneficial.  Everyone will have their favorites but just because you prefer one over the other doesn’t mean you should never look at what the other vendor is doing.

If you’re a consultant, reseller, integrator, or customer you’re most powerful ally is options.  Options to choose best-of-breed, option to price multiple vendors, option to switch vendors when it suites your customer.  Throwing away an entire set of options due to a specific vendor bias is a major disadvantage.  Every major vendor has some great products, some bad products, and some in the middle.  Every major vendor plays marketing games, and teases with roadmaps.  It’s part of the business.

If a major vendor makes a market transition into a new area it’s beneficial to just about everyone.  The product itself may be a better fit for the customer, the new product may force price drops in existing vendors products, the new product may drive new innovation into the field which will shortly be adopted by the existing vendors.  The list goes on.

Summary:

As IT professionals objectivity is one of our key strengths, sacrifice it due to bias and your making a mistake.  When you see blogs, articles, reports, tests that emphatically favor one product over another take them with a grain of salt and do your own research.

If you have engineer in your title or job role you shouldn’t be making major product decisions based on feelings, PowerPoint, or PDF.  Real hands on and raw data (with a knowledge of how the data was gathered and why) are key tools to making informed decisions.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • X

Related posts:

  1. Recent Conversation with the Founder of Tolly Group
  2. How Emulex Broke Out of the ‘Card Pusher’ Box
  3. 10 Things to Know About Cisco UCS
  4. The Difference Between ‘Foothold’ and ‘Lock-In’
  5. My First Podcast: ‘Coffee With Thomas’
Quick Thoughts ciscoHPobjectivitytolly reportUCS

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

My First Podcast: ‘Coffee With Thomas’

September 7, 2010

I had the pleasure of joining Thomas Jones on his new podcast ‘Coffee With Thomas’.’  His podcast is always good, well put together and about 30 minutes.  It’s done in a very refreshing conversation style as if your having a cup of coffee.  If your interested in listening to us…

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • X
Read More

The Brocade FCoE Proposition

September 6, 2010September 6, 2010

I recently realized that I, like a lot of the data center industry, have completely forgotten about Brocade recently.  There has been little talked about on their FCoE front, Fibre Channel Front, or CNAs.  Cisco and HP have been dominating social media with blade and FCoE battles, but I haven’t…

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • X
Read More

Technology Passion

May 25, 2011May 18, 2020

The May 24th IDC report on server market share by the IDC validated a technology I’ve been passionate about for some time; Cisco unified Computing System (UCS.)  For the first time since UCS’s launch two years ago Cisco reported server earnings to IDC with amazing result – #3 in global…

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • X
Read More

Comments (4)

  1. Pingback: Why Cisco UCS is my ‘A-Game’ Server Architecture
  2. Pingback: Why Cisco UCS is my ‘A-Game’ Server Architecture | News Blog
  3. Pingback: Objectivity |
  4. Pingback: ‘A-Game’ Server Architecture |

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Creative Commons License
This work by Joe Onisick and Define the Cloud, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Disclaimer

All brand and company names are used for identification purposes only. These pages are not sponsored or sanctioned by any of the companies mentioned; they are the sole work and property of the authors. While the author(s) may have professional connections to some of the companies mentioned, all opinions are that of the individuals and may differ from official positions of those companies. This is a personal blog of the author, and does not necessarily represent the opinions and positions of his employer or their partners.
©2025 Define The Cloud | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes