With all of theÂ hype around private clouds and manufacturer private cloud infrastructure stacks I thought Iâ€™d take some timeÂ to differentiate between â€˜private-cloudâ€™ and â€˜converged-infrastructure.â€™Â For some background on Private Cloud see two of my previous posts: http://www.definethecloud.net/building-a-private-cloud and http://www.definethecloud.net/is-private-cloud-a-unicorn.
Private clouds typically consist of four architectural stages (I describe these here: http://www.definethecloud.net/smt-matrix-and-vblock-architectures-for-private-cloud):
To build a true private cloud hardware/platform consolidation is layered with virtualization, automation and orchestration (without which the â€˜On-Demand Self Service requirement of NISTâ€™s definition is not met.)Â The end result is a IT model and infrastructure that moves at the pace of business.
Converged infrastructure on the other hand is a subset of this, typically consolidation and virtualization but could possibly include some automation.Â With all major vendors selling some form of â€˜Integrated stackâ€™ marketed at Private Cloud I thought Iâ€™d take a look at where four of the most popular actually fall along the path.
Starting from the bottom (as in bottom of the pyramid rather than bottom in quality, value, etc.)
FlexPod: FlexPod is an architecture designed using NetApp storage and Cisco compute and networking components.Â The FlexPod architectures address various business and application needs but do not include automation/orchestration software.Â The idea being that customers will have the flexibility to choose the level and type of automation/orchestration suite they require.
Vblock: Vblocks consist of EMC storage couple with VMware virtualization and Cisco Network/Compute.Â Additionally VBlock incorporates EMCâ€™s Unified Infrastructure Manager (UIM) which enables automation and single point of management for most of the infrastructure components. An orchestration suite would still be required for true private cloud.
Exalogic: Oracleâ€™s stack offering is Exalogic which combines Oracle hardware with their middleware and software to provide a private cloud platform tailored toward Java environments.Â The provisioning tools included offer the promise of private cloud â€˜on-demand self-service.â€™
BladeSystem Matrix: Is built upon HP BladeSystem, storage, network and software components and is managed by HPâ€™s Cloud Service Automation.Â The automation and orchestration tools included in that software suite put HPâ€™s offering in the private cloud arena.
Depending on the drivers, requirements, and individual environment all of these stacks can offer customers a platform from which to rapidly build cloud services.Â The key is in deciding what you want and what is the best tool to get you there.Â The best tool to get you there will be based on both ROI and business agility as cost is not the only reason for a migration to cloud.
For a deeper look at private cloud stacks check out my post at Networking Computing (http://www.networkcomputing.com/private-cloud/229900081.)